Marine Arena


It is currently 19 Jun 2018, 04:33

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 02:19 
Offline
Tourney Winner
Tourney Winner
User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2017, 16:35
Posts: 65
BLK, please stop bro. I dont mind if eury sent my pics okay ?
She said i was cute and i remember couple of years she said i was hot, Pazo and I almost got into fight for her lol, because she said Pazo was hot too.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 02:40 
Offline
Publisher
Publisher
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2017, 15:41
Posts: 428
Grim and Kontz were not in the same bracket as yours. BLK. You were bracket 4. Check your replays.
Why are you talking about evidence? There never was a doubt about what Raynor did. The whole discussion was about if it warrants banning him from playing. I am saying that in all the possible choices that I mentioned (Raynor, Bo3, map rotation, banning me) regarding the tourney you happened to side with Grim.
And the answer was YES. It doesn't matter where or who we sided when the decision fall, it would please neither you if we sided with Grim or the other side had we sided with you. Best of 3 was the US standard for tourneys. Monty was using that same rubric since he hosted the earlier tourneys. Map rotation was done by a randomize, not because Grim advocated for or against, but because it was the same protocol Monty had since US tourney days.

And for the record, right after the tourney that Raynor messed up was over, Monty thought about banning Raynor. He said nothing because he was sure that he would not host another.

As for your banning, Excal and Bash were the team that bought up the challenge. Nuku was the ref, Monty was the host. As rules stated, Hosts can override the ref at their discretion, just as hosts reserve the rights to review the sign up sheets. Previous EU tourneys had Monty stated this in the rules. This went without any exception. When the rules were posted you raised no such question and it is amazing to me that you would bring this up after the fact, now. And I should add that by entering the contest, you explicitly agreed with the terms and we assumed you've read them because on both early and last-minute sign up sheets, we had the links to the rules.

Here are the rules again: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=31


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 03:02 
Offline
Newcomer
Newcomer

Joined: 04 Jan 2017, 21:39
Posts: 102
i saw my name a awful lot in this thread. Which is very rude in america to say someones name before asking if you can use it first.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 03:06 
Offline
Publisher
Publisher
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2017, 15:41
Posts: 428
Valhalla wrote: i saw my name a awful lot in this thread. Which is very rude in america to say someones name before asking if you can use it first.
It has to be, Raynor. We have to be open with what happened so we can learn and improve the future.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 03:12 
Offline
Newcomer
Newcomer

Joined: 04 Jan 2017, 21:39
Posts: 102
Open about what? We already were open about my accident with the gg thing, i payed the price in full. So lets forget about it and move on from there. Now about this whole BLK situation, its pretty painful obviously that he played fair...i mean raynor marines arent a great idea but i can see the reason for getting them. They are strong units, and would have done well in a bracket with someone who didnt just go HT. Gymshark in fact did better the next game that they remade without blk in it. Not to mention if anyone was feeding it was the 950 bounty WhoAmI.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 03:24 
Offline
Publisher
Publisher
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2017, 15:41
Posts: 428
ts pretty painful obviously that he played fair...i mean raynor marines arent a great idea but i can see the reason for getting them.
The challenge at the time was intentional feeding. The rules said this means an auto disqualification.

See here: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=31


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 04:29 
Offline
Newcomer
Newcomer

Joined: 04 Jan 2017, 21:39
Posts: 102
show me a spot in the replay where he intentionally fed? He split vs the ht and didnt lose any hero or elites to gym, while he and raiden actually killed the HT and medi x2 i believe? So no, no intentional feeding like running units into them. There isnt much you can do when you go rine tech and then the person next to you gets a ht....


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: EU-7 Postmortem
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 04:40 
Offline
Publisher
Publisher
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2017, 15:41
Posts: 428
I have a better idea, I am going to move all of this game 3 decision questions to a new thread. Nuku was ref. Monty was host. They decided.


Top
   
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 08:18 
Offline
Newcomer
Newcomer

Joined: 18 Jan 2017, 13:18
Posts: 35
Reading this discussion and having seen the stream with discussion going alongside with it, it seems to me that a game restart and a warning to BLK would have been a more fair solution.


Top
   
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2017, 11:22 
Offline
Tourney Winner
Tourney Winner
User avatar

Joined: 04 Jan 2017, 19:19
Posts: 86
And I would have loved to maintain the bounty of the raven, the four sentries and the reaper:D, but fortunately it did not matter.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIMLoLxmTDw


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
Theme Created by HOLLYSMOKE
Theme updated to phpBB 3.1.3 by KamijouTouma